
Perfume and Fragrance
Exposure During PregnancyLinks to Learning
Disabilities, ADD and Behavior Disorders
The following is one chapter from a 1997 Graduate Student Research Project
conducted at the
University of South Florida. The project involved locating published peer reviewed
medical journal articles which have shown various environmental and chemical exposure
factors can cause learning disabilities, hyperactivity and other disorders by damaging the
delicate brain growth process in the unborn child during pregnancy.
Author: Richard W. Pressinger (M.Ed.)
Project Supervisor: Kofi Marfo (Ph.D.) University of South Florida, Special Education
Department
email correspondence: research@chem-tox.com
Learning Disability Research Web Site: www.chem-tox.com/pregnancy/learning_disabilities.htm
Fragrance
Exposure Causes Aggression
Hyperactivity and Nerve Damage
Neurotoxicology,
Volume 1:221-237, 1979
One fragrance chemical used in perfumes, colognes, soaps, detergents and
cosmetics has been found to damage brain tissue in the laboratory animals tested. The
compound, called acetyl ethyl tetramethyl tetralin (AETT), was commonly used in the above
mentioned consumer products until scientists realized the chemical demonstrated serious
neurotoxic properties. In fact, the chemical was in widespread use as a fragrance
component in cosmetic, toiletry and soap products for a period of 22 years before the
problem was detected. The first laboratory evidence of a problem came after researchers
detected repeated percutaneous exposure to AETT in rats resulted in an extraordinary blue
discoloration of the skin and internal organs, followed by behavioral changes and
degeneration of the white matter in the brain. Upon realizing the potential harm from this
compound, the fragrance industry voluntarily discontinued its use. This action was
accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) early in 1978.
In an attempt to further quantify the exact nature of the neurotoxic
properties of AETT, detailed testing of the compound was conducted by Dr. Peter S. Spencer
and colleagues at the Program for Environmental Neurotoxicology and Teratology at the
Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. According to Dr. Spencers research,
"These studies show AETT to be a cumulative neurotoxin capable
of inducing in the rat hyperirritability, limb weakness, and widespread structural nervous
system damage characterized by neurocellular ceroid pigmentary degeneration and widespread
demyelination."
Three groups of rats were exposed to AETT on their skin or via food at
different doses for a period over several months. Summarizing the results the researchers
stated,
"Neurological and behavioral dysfunction developed in
proportion to the dose and duration of intoxication. Animals dosed with 18-100 mg/kg/day
of AETT became hyperirritable with the onset of tissue discoloration. They were easily
startled and did not show a normal habituation to auditory and tactile stimuli. There was
excessive spontaneous motor activity, and animals commonly attempted to bite the examiner
upon handling. By 3-4 weeks, high -dosed rats (over 25 mg/kg/day) developed a peculiar,
intermittent back-arching syndrome (see picture). By 5-6 weeks, there was an abnormal
hind-limb extensor reflex elicited when the hind feet were raised by lifting the tail.
Gait abnormalities developed with time and, by 9 weeks, ataxia, limb weakness, foot-drop
and eversion of the hind feet were apparent. This clinical picture remained largely
unchanged throughout the remaining period of intoxication. However, a single high-dosed
rat at 26 weeks developed a picture of extreme irritability, inability to stand, and
clonic-like movements of the limbs which were exacerbated by external stimuli. Lower-dosed
animals also developed weakness (25 mg/kg/day), hyperexcitability (18 mg/kg/day), or only
blue discoloration (9 mg/kg/day).
Regarding the physical effects upon the brain, the researchers observed
degeneration of the "myelin sheath" that surrounds the axons that connect brain
cells. As stated by the researchers,
"Demyelination had begun at 8 weeks in animals receiving 36
mg/kg/day percutaneously, and was apparent by 14 weeks in rats receiving 25 mg/kg/day.
Demyelination commenced with splitting of myelin sheaths at the intraperiod line, followed
by the accumulation of fluid, which caused the formation of edematous myelin bubbles.
In conclusion, the researchers stated,
"This study has demonstrated AETT to be a cumulative neurotoxin
in the rat, capable of inducing a complex spectrum of behavioral and neuropathological
changes as a function of dose and time following exposure by oral or percutaneous routes.
Behavior abnormalities commence with hyperirritability and, depending on dosage, may
progress temporally to ataxia and weakness. These behavioral and neurological signs are
associated with the early appearance of neurocellular pigmentation and the subsequent
development of widespread demyelination and scattered axonal degeneration in the central
peripheral nervous systems."
Although AETT was subsequently removed from consumer products, it
dramatizes the potential for neurotoxic compounds to be allowed in public use as it took
22 years before the problem was acknowledged and corrected. Because of the ubiquitous
nature of fragrance compounds and their close source contact to the individual, and
therefore the embryo and fetus, a cautious attitude concerning fragrance compounds during
pregnancy should be maintained.
Drs. Peter S. Spencer, Arnold B. Sterman, Dikran Horooupian, and
Monica Bischoff
Program for Environ. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Dept. of Neuroscience and Pathology
The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology and the Rose F. Kennedy Center for Research in
Mental Retardation and Human Development
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Toxicology Department, Avon Products Inc., Suffern, New York
Neurotoxicology 1:221-237, 1979
Common
Fragrance Ingredient
Damages Connections Between Brain Cells
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Volume 75:571-575 (1984)
Musk Ambrette is the name given to a commonly used fragrance
ingredient, that according to researchers, causes serious brain damage in laboratory
animals exposed to the chemical.
Musk Ambrette, whose chemical name is
2,6-dinitro-3-methoxy-4-tert-butyltoluene, is a common fixative ingredient that is
currently added to fragrances in order to slow their evaporation, thereby making it more
attractive to the consumer. It is found within most fragrances at a level of 1 to 3.5%.
The chemical is also used to a lesser extent as an artificial flavor in compositions such
as cherry, nut, spice vanilla, and mint.
The neurotoxic properties of Musk Ambrette are well established and as
stated by the researchers,
"Musk ambrette, a nitro-musk compound widely used as a fixative
in fragrance formulations and found to a lesser degree in flavor compositions, produces
hindlimb weakness when administered in the diet or applied to skin of rats for periods up
to 12 weeks. Underlying neuropathologic changes consist of primary demyelination and
distal axonal degeneration in selected regions of the central and peripheral nervous
system."
Primary demyelination means that the insulative myelin sheath
surrounding the nerve cell connections are slowly being worn away. Degeneration of the
axons means the actual connection from brain cell to brain cell is being destroyed by the
chemical.
Drs. P. S. Spencer, M. C. Bischoff-Fenton, O.M. Moreno, D. L.
Opdyke, R. A. Ford
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Vol.75:571-575 (1984) |